Lockdown and the pandemic may now, in 2024 feel like a distant memory that we would all rather forget, however, not all teaching and learning has resumed its in-person delivery.
Online vs Offline, what’s the difference?
While it may not be readily apparent, I believe there are subtle distinctions in critical thinking between an in-person classroom setting and an online environment. As some of you may be aware, I commenced my independent workshop sessions during the pandemic. While there were beneficial activities and a degree of engagement, I longed for the interpersonal connection found in a traditional classroom-style setup.
Looking ahead a few years to when restrictions eased and regular practice resumed, I observed that students desired that same sense of connection.
What were the differences from a critical thinking perspective
In the online setting, students frequently hesitated to participate, possibly due to a fear of judgment. Consequently, critical thinking often remained subdued, with interactions in chat discussions remaining superficial. Additionally, many students faced heightened pressures, including caretaking responsibilities for family members.
However, in face-to-face sessions, I observed a change. Students could disconnect from external distractions and fully engage in discussions, exchanging ideas freely, providing constructive feedback, and being receptive to their peers’ perspectives.
What’s different critically from now and pre-pandemic?
I would argue that currently, there’s a heightened political engagement, which is fostering stronger argumentation skills among students from a critical thinking perspective.
However, I’ve also noticed certain “blind spots” where there’s a mismatch between topics that hold personal significance for students and those that don’t. This observation seems consistent regardless of the pandemic.
What can be done to support those who are learning fully online
Inclusivity. In my view, inclusivity stands as the paramount aspect. When students feel valued, safe, and a sense of belonging, they thrive in a supportive environment. Additionally, clear instructions and structured guidance are crucial. Establishing expectations from the beginning ensures students understand their tasks and what to anticipate from both the educator and their peers.
Would a hybrid system still work?
I believe a hybrid system can be effective, provided it’s designed with all students in consideration. While it presents logistical challenges for educators, with clear direction and planning, it can be successful.
What could the future look like?
Emphasising the importance of critical thinking overtly is essential. While some students may be familiar with it as a skill, others might be encountering it for the first time. Therefore, deliberately discussing critical thinking, whether in online or in-person settings, is crucial.
If you found this blog post intriguing and wish to delve further into critical thinking, feel free to explore my podcast, Talking CriticalEd.
